ECPC’s Dec. 2001 Atmospheric Forecasts

 

contributed by J. Roads, S. Chen, J. Ritchie

 

Experimental Climate Prediction Center Scripps Institution of Oceanography UCSD, 0224

La Jolla, CA 92093

 


1. ECPC’s Forecast System

 

As previously discussed by Roads et al. (2001a), the Scripps Experimental Climate Prediction Center (ECPC) currently uses the reanalysis I version (Kalnay et al. 1996) of the National Centers for Environmental Prediction’s (NCEP’s) medium range forecast (MRF) model or global spectral model (GSM; Roads et al. 1999). These global forecasts (4xdaily-7 days and weekly to 12-weeks) start from the NCEP operational 00UTC global analysis. The GSM then forces a regional spectral model (RSM; Juang and Kanamitsu, 1994; Juang et al. 1997; Chen et al. 1999, Anderson et al. 2000, Roads and Chen 2000) in order to gain increased spatial resolution (50-25 km resolution) at shorter time scales (4xdaily-7 days and weekly to 4 weeks) for several selected regions (US, CA, SW, Brazil). At even smaller space (2-km resolution) and time scales (8xdaily to 2 days) either the NCEP analysis or GSM forces a corresponding nonhydrostatic mesoscale spectral model (MSM; Juang, 1997) for the Hawaiian Islands. All atmospheric models are based upon the same physics used in the GSM and can, in principle, be updated as the GSM is updated. Output products from the atmospheric models include a fire weather index (FWI, see Roads et al. 1997) and associated variables such as 2m-temperature, relative humidity and 10m-windspeed as well as precipitation and soil moisture. The global atmospheric model is now forcing an ocean model (Auad et al. 2001) and corresponding ocean forecasts are shown in Auad et al. (2000).

 

2. Forecast Skill Evaluations

 

2 years worth of forecasts (104 forecasts) have been used to develop a GSM forecast climatology dependent upon season as well as lag. Both means and standard deviations were derived in order to provide normalized (by the standard deviation) anomalies. As discussed by Roads et al. (2001b,c, d) and Chen et al. (2001), the GSM provides skillful forecasts of temperature, precipitation, soil moisture and a fire weather index at long forecast ranges. Although the greatest skill occurs initially and then decays, daily, weekly or monthly forecast skill does not ever reach zero and forecasts averaged into monthly and seasonal averages demonstrate significant skill (see Reichler et al. 2001), which may be comparable to empirical long-range forecast methodologies. Similar evaluation efforts are underway for the regional forecasts, which currently use the GSM initial state and boundary conditions

 

3. Global seasonal GSM forecasts and US monthly RSM forecasts

 

Fig.s 1,2,3,4 show the GSM and RSM seasonal normalized (by GSM standard deviation) anomaly forecasts of 2-m surface temperature, precipitation, soil moisture and the FWI. It should be noted that both the GSM and the RSM use the same GSM climatology to calculate the anomalies and standard deviations, which may have an effect on the RSM anomalies discussed below. We are still trying to develop a more suitable RSM climatology for the RSM simulations.

 

Below normal seasonal temperatures (Fig. 1) are being forecast for most southern US states, the tropical eastern Pacific, tropical eastern Atlantic, Siberia, the Southern Indian ocean, and the southern Pacific coast of Australia. Above normal temperatures are being forecast for the subtropical Pacific, the NH Atlantic, eastern Africa, the southern polar oceans, and the western tropical Pacific.

 

Above normal seasonal precipitation forecasts (Fig. 2) include the subtropical western Pacific, the tropical Atlantic and the tropical eastern Pacific, western Canada and the Middle East. Below normal precipitation is being forecast for the subtropical South Pacific, the subtropical North Atlantic, equatorial and Southern Africa, eastern Canada and along the Asian coast. The US is forecast to have normal precipitation, except for the wet areas over the west and the dry regions over the northeast.

 

Soil moisture (Fig. 3) forecasts are indicating that most of the land regions may be dry, with perhaps the major exception being the Asian region. Over the US the forecasts are close to climatology, except for perhaps the Rocky Mountains, where the RSM is known to have a precipitation bias.

 

The seasonal FWI (Fig. 4) is forecast to be below normal over Mexico and Asia and above normal over Northeast Brazil, equatorial and South Africa, Alaska and Siberia. Over the US, southern California, southeastern Arizona, and Montana are above normal, whereas below normal or normal FWI is forecast for other areas.

 

Other experimental GSM and RSM forecast fields (wind speed, relative humidity) and additional forecast months) can be found at http://ecpc.ucsd.edu/projects/ellfb/. Additional forecast ranges, variables, and regions are displayed at http://ecpc.ucsd.edu/m2s/m2s_ECPC_forecasts.html/. All forecasts and new experimental fire danger (USFS fire danger indices), land surface, and ocean predictions (seasonal to decadal) can be linked from http://ecpc.ucsd.edu/predictions/.

 

References

 

Anderson, B.T., J. O. Roads, S. -C. Chen, and H-M.H. Juang, 2000: Regional Simulation of the Low-level Monsoon Winds Over the Gulf of California and Southwest United States. JGR-Atmospheres 105 (D14) 17,955-17969.

 

Auad, G., J. Roads, A. Miller, Ritchie, 2001: Seasonal Forecasts of the Tropical and Extratropical Pacific Ocean. ELLFB bulletin, Mar. 2001.

 

Auad, G., J.O. Roads, A. Miller, and D. Cayan, 2001:  An ocean model response to NCEP, COADS and FSU surface flux fields. Journal of Geophys. Res  (in press).

 

Chen, S. -C., J.O. Roads, H. -M. H. Juang, M. Kanamitsu, Global to regional simulation of California's wintertime precipitation. J. Geophys. Res., 104(24), 31517-31532, 1999.

 

Chen, S-C. J. O. Roads, and M. Wu, 2001: ECPC’s Asia forecasts.  Journal of Terrestrial-Atmosphere-Oceanography, 12, 377-400.

 

Juang, H. -M. H., and M. Kanamitsu, 1994: The NMC nested regional spectral model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122, 3-26.

 

Juang, H. -M. H., S. -Y. Hong and M. Kanamitsu, 1997: The NCEP regional spectral model: an update. Bulletin Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78, 2125-2143.

 

Kalnay, E. et al., 1996: The NMC/NCAR reanalysis project, Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc., 77, 437- 471.

 

Reichler, T., J. Roads, M. Kanamitsu, 2001: Role of initial and boundary conditions in seasonal predictability. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics (submitted)

 

Roads, J.O., S. -C. Chen, F. M. Fujioka, H. Juang, and M. Kanamitsu. 1997. Global to Regional Fire Weather Forecasts. Int. Forest Fire News, 33-37.

 

Roads, J.O., S. -C. Chen, M. Kanamitsu, and H. Juang, 1999: Surface Water Characteristics in the NCEP Global Spectral Model and Reanalysis, J. Geophys. Res. 104, 19307-19327.

 

Roads, J.O. and S-C. Chen, 2000:  Surface Water and Energy Budgets in the NCEP Regional Spectral Model. JGR-Atmospheres. 105 (D24) p. 29, 539.

 

Roads, J., S. -C. Chen, J. Ritchie, 2001a: ECPC’s Weekly to Seasonal U.S. Forecasts of FWI, Soil Moisture, and Precipitation. ELLFB bulletin, Jun. 2001.

 

Roads, J.O., S-C. Chen and F. Fujioka, 2001b:  ECPC’s Weekly to Seasonal Global Forecasts. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 82, 639-658.

 

Roads, J., B. Rockel, E. Raschke, 2001c: Evaluation of ECPC’s Seasonal Forecasts Over the BALTEX Region and Europe. Meteorologische Zeitschrift. (in press).

 

Roads, J. and S. Brenner, 2001d: Global Model Seasonal Forecasts for the Mediterranean Region. Israel Journal of Earth Sciences (in press)


 


 

 

 

Fig. 1 Temperature (12/2001-02/2002) normalized (by GSM standard deviation) anomalies: (upper) GSM forecast; (lower) RSM forecast.


 

 

Fig. 2 Precipitation (12/2001-02/2002) normalized (by GSM standard deviation) anomalies: (upper) GSM forecast; (lower) RSM forecast.


 

 

Fig. 3 Soil Moisture (12/2001-02/2002) normalized (by GSM standard deviation) anomalies: (upper) GSM forecast; (lower) RSM forecast.


 

 

 

Fig. 4 FWI (12/2001-02/2002) normalized (by GSM standard deviation) anomalies: (upper) GSM forecast; (lower) RSM forecast.