FORECAST OF NORTH EAST BRAZIL SEASONAL RAINFALL FOR FEBRUARY TO MAY 2005 USING EMPIRICAL AND DYNAMICAL METHODS AND ATMOSPHERE AND OCEAN DATA UP TO END NOVEMBER 2004

 

contributed by A.W. Colman,  and R.J. Graham

 

Met Office, Bracknell, United Kingdom

 


This year, the forecast signal is weaker than usual. The strongest signal is for the average category, though this is not consistent across the region, with dry slightly favoured in some eastern regions and wet slightly favoured in some western regions.

 

1. Introduction

 

Real-time forecasts of mean rainfall during the NE Brazil rainy season (approximately March-May) have been issued by the Met Office for each season since 1987 following research by Ward and Folland (1991) and by Folland et al (2001). Forecasts are issued in December, early February and early March using the latest available ocean and atmosphere information and are provided for 11 rectangular regions located between 2.5o and 10o south and between the Atlantic coast west to 50o west. The corners of the rectangular region correspond with the grid used by the Met Office GLObal SEAsonal (GLOSEA) model

 

Forecasts are in probability format and are presented in the following ways: probabilities for tercile and quintile categories; the probability of an extreme season, defined as a season wetter or drier than any during the past 10 years; and the probability of a wetter season than last year.

 

Dynamical model output from the Met Office GLObal SEAsonal (GLOSEA) coupled ocean-atmosphere general circulation model and SST based statistical predictors have been combined using a multi-variate discriminant equation to produce one set of probability forecasts. 

 

Included with the forecasts are assessments of the probability forecasts using the Relative Operating Characteristic (ROC) skill measure, a WMO standard assessment measure for probability forecasts.

 

2. Forecast System

 

2.1 Statistical Predictors

 

The statistical forecast is based on the same two predictors as in previous forecasts; (see Folland et. al.,2001 ). The two predictors used are an index derived from Atlantic Sea Surface Temperature (SST) patterns and an index derived from Pacific SST patterns.

 

Current SST patterns

 

SST is currently slightly above average in the East Tropical Pacific, which favours below average rainfall. SST  is currently slightly above average in the South-East tropical Atlantic, which favours above average rainfall in NE Brazil.  Thus there are contrasting signals from the two predictors.

 

Predicted SST

 

Time coefficients of the Atlantic and SST patterns are also calculated using predicted SST using the statistical forecast system described in Colman and Davey (2003). SST predictions are produced from earlier SST observations using an equally weighted average of forecasts from 3 methods, persistence of box area  average  SST anomaly, Global Scale Canonical Correlation Analysis and linear regression from neighbouring boxes. Predicted SST are used in a 2 tier approach to seasonal forecasting. Firstly the SST prediction system is used to produce forecasts of 10 degree latitude x longitude box anomalies for February from November anomalies. Secondly, the February anomalies are used to evaluate SST pattern time coefficients which are substituted into regression or discriminant prediction equations to make rainfall forecasts.

 

For this forecast we use index values calculated from latest available SST observations (i.e. for November 2004)  and index values calculated using predicted SST for February 2005.  These make up 4 of the predictors used in the discriminant equation described in section 2.3.

 

2.2 GLOSEA Dynamical Forecasts

 

The GLOSEA model replaced the uncoupled atmosphere GCM system as our main tool for global seasonal prediction in 2003. The GLOSEA forecasts are produced monthly as an ensemble of 40 members. The members are generated from slightly perturbed ocean initial conditions (for more about GLOSEA see http://www.metoffice.com/research/seasonal/technical.html ) . The model is run out to 6 months ahead. The model output is calibrated in the discriminant equation using hindcasts from 43 years (1960-2002) produced as part of the DEMETER project  (see http://www.ecmwf.int/research/demeter/) for more information about DEMETER).

 

For this forecast we use the GLOSEA prediction initialised in early December which covers the period March to May.

 

2.3 Content of Discriminant Forecast Equation

 

The forecast is produced using an equation of the form

 

Tercile probability for gridbox g = 1/40 x SUM (f ( a x November Atlantic SST index  + b x November Pacific SST index  + c x predicted February Atlantic SST index + d x predicted February Pacific SST index + e x GLOSEA member  m forecast for gridbox g ) for 40 members m=1,40)

 

Where f is an exponential function adjusted so the sum of probabilities for the 3 terciles=1.

Coefficients a,b,c,d,e and function f are all evaluated using historical SST data and GLOSEA hindcasts produced using the DEMETER project.

 

The discriminant equation effectively calibrates the model output and corrects for any bias observed over the 1960-2002 training period.  (See Afifi and Azen, 1979 for more about discriminant analysis).

 

3. Northern Brazil Regions

 

 

Our forecast area consists of 11 rectangular regions each covering 3.75o longitude x 2.5o latitude, which are displayed in figure 1. Grid point rainfalls at the corner points are averaged to calculate values for the region. This smoothing reduces local errors and improves skill scores. The rainfall data used to make and assess the forecasts were supplied to us by the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, by Prof. Hastenrath at the University of Wisconsin and by FUNCEME and INPE in Brazil. GPCP  (Global Precipitation Climatology Project)  data were used to fill data gaps for recent years.  Observational data for at least 2 of the grid points at opposite corners are required for a region to be considered for the forecast. For the 11 regions used the correlation between independent forecasts and observed values exceeds 0.5 over the period 1948-1997 (this criteria formed the basis of selecting the regions).

 

Region number 8 centred at 39.375oW, 6.25oS is the closest to the regions used previously for issued forecasts and is referred to as the Standard NE Brazil region (SNEBR).

 

As in previous years, the rainfall for each region is categorised into 5 equiprobable categories (over 1961-1990) called quints and referred to as Very Dry, Dry, Average, Wet and Very Wet quints.   For compatibility with other forecasts including Regional Climate Outlook Fora (RCOF) products, the rainfall is also presented in terms of 3 equiprobable categories called terciles.

 

4. Forecasts and Forecast Skill

 

4.1 Quint Probability forecasts (Figure 2a-e)

 

Quint probabilities are presented in figure 2a-e, note that for quintile categories the climatological expectation is 20%. The average category is most likely over some central and eastern regions (3,8,9,11), though there is a tendency for wet or very wet to be favoured in parts of the west (1,2,6,7) and very dry to be slightly favoured in parts of the east (4,5,10).

 

 

4.2 Quint forecast ROC assessments (fig. 2f-j):

 

The ROC skill of probability forecasts for the 5 quints for the 11 regions is presented in figure 2f-j.  ROC scores (Stanski et. al. 1989, Graham et. al. 2000) are a widely used measure for probability forecasts and are a WMO standard measure. The expected ROC score from random chance is 0.5. If the ROC score is greater than 0.5 there is evidence of skill. Skill is clearly highest for the outer category forecasts (VERY DRY and VERY WET).

 

4.3  Probabilities of terciles, extreme seasons and of a wetter season than last year (Figure 3)

 

Forecast probabilities are displayed in graphical format in figure 3. The tercile probabilities are similar to the quint forecasts in that the probabilities are close to climatological expectation (0.33) with a tendency towards wetter than average in the south-westernmost regions . An extreme dry season (drier than the last 10 years) is less likely than expected from climatology (i.e. less than 10%) in all regions. An extreme wet season is also less likely than expected from climatology in all regions except 2,8 and 10. The high probability for an extreme wet season in region 10 should be regarded with caution. It is linked to a lack of wet seasons in this region in recent years and consequently a low 10 year maximum threshold. The 2005 season is expected to be wetter than the 2004 season in the regions 7, 8, 9 and 10 but drier than 2004 in other regions.

 

4.4    ROC skill of tercile, extreme season and wetter season than last year probabilities

 

The ROC skill of probability forecasts for the 3 terciles is presented in figure 4. Monte Carlo tests have been used to locate the 5% significance levels for these probability ROC scores. Significant skills are marked by * on fig 4.  Skill is mainly confined to the outer categories (DRY and WET).

 

 

5. Overall Summary and “best estimate” categories

 

All Regions including SNEBR but excluding 6 and 7:  The signal either favours average or is weak. For these regions, our best estimate category is the AVERAGE category.

 

Regions 6,7: In these regions there is a tendency for a skew in probabilities to the wet categories, with very wet most favoured. Because of the generally conflicting signals, our best estimate category for these regions is the WET category.

 

 

REFERENCES

 

Afifi, A.A. and Azen, S.P. 1979: Statistical Analysis – a computer oriented Approach. Academic Press, New York. 

 

Colman, A.W., Davey M.K. 2003: Statistical Prediction of Global Sea-Surface Temperature Anomalies. Int. J.Climatology, 23 1677-1697.

 

Folland, C.K., Colman, A.W., Rowell, D.P  & Davey M.K. 2001: Predictability of northeast Brazil rainfall and real-time forecast skill, 1987-98. J.Climate, 14 1937-1958.

 

Graham,R.J., Evans, A.D.L, Mylne,K.R., Harrison, M.S.J. and Robertson, K.B. 2000:  Assessment of seasonal predictability using atmospheric general circulation models. Q.J.Royal.Met.Soc.,126 2211-2240.   

 

Potts, J.M., Folland, C.K., Jolliffe, I. and Sexton, D. 1996: Revised “LEPS” scores for assessing climate model simulations and long-range forecasts. J. Climate, 9, 34-53.

 

Ward, M.N. and Folland, C.K. 1991: Prediction of seasonal rainfall in the North Nordeste of Brazil using eigenvectors of sea surface temperature. Int. J. Climatology.,11,711-743.

 

FIGURES

 

FIGURE 1: Forecast regions

 

FIGURE 2: Combined GLOSEA/statistical discriminant  Probability forecasts of quints for February-May 2004.

 

FIGURE 3: Combined GLOSEA/statistical discriminant  Probability forecasts of terciles, 10 year extremes and of a wetter season than last year for February-May 2004.

 

FIGURE 4: ROC Skill of GLOSEA/statistical discriminant tercile forecasts (1960-2002)


 

 

 

 


FIGURE 1

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

FIGURE 2


FIGURE 3

 


FIGURE 4