SST predictions with an intermediate coupled model of the tropical Pacific.
contributed by Boris Dewitte1, Dasha Gushchina 2, Yves duPenhoat 1 and Rodrigo Abarca del Rio3
1LEGOS/CNES/IRD 14 Av. E. Belin,
31401 Toulouse Cedex 4, France
2Meteorological Department, Geographical Faculty,
Moscow State University, Vorobyevy gory, Moscow,
119899, Russia
3 DEFAO, University of Concepcion,
Casilla 160-C, Concepcion,
Chile
Forecasts of the tropical Pacific SST are
presented here using two intermediate coupled models. The oceanic component
consists in a three baroclinic mode ocean and the
mixed layer model differs from the Cane and Zebiak
(1987) model in the parameterization of the vertical advection terms and the
basic state (cf. Dewitte, 2000). The atmospheric
component is either a statistical atmospheric model based on the singular value
decomposition (SVD) of observed sea surface temperature (SST) and wind stress
anomalies (see Périgaud et al., 2000) or a
Gill(1980)'s dynamical tropical atmosphere. Initial conditions for the
prediction runs are produced in a coupled mode by nudging the observed winds
(FSU winds for the period 1961-1992, ERS1-2 winds from may 1992 until september 2000, QuikSCAT winds
from october 2000) to the simulated winds as in Chen
et al. (1995). The skill of the models for the NINO3 SST index over various
periods and for the 1997-1998 El Niño is presented in Dewitte
et al. (2002).
Figure 1
shows model predicted SST and wind stress anomalies in the tropical Pacific for
the next four seasons in the case of the statistical atmosphere. These are
ensemble averages of 12 forecasts started from Jun-Jul-Aug 2004 conditions. For
producing the initial conditions of the individual forecasts, random noise was
added to the system with an approach similar to Kirtman and Schopf
(1998).
Both models (Figure
2) are predicting slightly cold conditions for 2004.
Caveat: The forecasts shown above are
experimental in nature. The reader is forewarned that the methods/forecasts are
new and subject to future change and improvement.
References:
Chen, D., S. E. Zebiak,
A. J. Busalacchi, and M. A. Cane, 1995: An improved
procedure for El Niño forecasting: Implication for predictability. Science,
269, 1699-1702.
Dewitte B., 2000: Sensitivity of an intermediate coupled
ocean-atmosphere model of the tropical Pacific to its oceanic vertical
structure. J. Climate, 13, 2363-2388.
Dewitte B., D. Gushchina, Y. duPenhoat and S. Lakeev, 2002: On
the importance of subsurface variability for ENSO simulation and prediction
with intermediate coupled models of the Tropical Pacific: A case study for the
1997-1998 El Niño. Geoph. Res. Lett., 29 (14). (
Gill, A., Some simple
solutions heat-induced tropical circulation. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 106, 447-462, 1980.
Kirtman, B. P. and P. S. Schopf,
1998: Decadal variability in ENSO predictability an
prediction, J. Climate, 11, 2804-2822
Périgaud C. C. Cassou,
B. Dewitte, L.-L. Fu and D. Neelin, 2000:
Using data and intermediate coupled models for seasonal-to-interannual
forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 3025-3049.
Zebiak, S. E. and M. A. Cane, 1987: A model El Niño-Southern
Oscillation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 115, 2262-2278.
Figure Captions:
Fig. 1:
model forecast of tropical Pacific SST (°C) and
wind stress (Dyn/cm2) anomalies for SON 2004, DJF 2004/2005,MAM 2005
and JJA 2005. Each forecast is an ensemble average of 12 sets of prediction
runs initialized from wind forced model outputs perturbated
by random noise. Observed data through 31st of August 2004 was used
to produce the forecast. Contour interval 0.5°C. Regions with SSTA amplitude
larger than 0.5°C (lower than -0.5°C) are in yellow-orange (blue). The longuest wind stress arrow on each map corresponds to the
value indicated on the right hand side. Only wind stress anomalies for which
wind modulus is larger than 0.1 Dyn/cm2 are plotted.
Fig.2: same as Fig.
1 but for the coupled model using the dynamical atmosphere.